Home > Misc > Installing Cisco VPN Client on Windows Server 2003

Installing Cisco VPN Client on Windows Server 2003

October 7th, 2004

I just installed Win2k3 server on my laptop – everything work just perfect except one thing.  Cisco’s VPN client software won’t even install on the machine.  It fails saying something about Virtual Adapter couldn’t install or something. Extensive searches of the internet turn up nothing.  A visit to the Cisco site reveals that Windows 2003 isn’t supported!  How can a company as big as Cisco not support Windows 2003!?  Are they making the totally incorrect assumption that people won’t want to use VPN with Windows 2003?  They can’t be that dense.
Maybe they just assume that since Windows 2003 has VPN built in I’ll just use that instead of their product all together?

Misc , , ,

  1. Anonymous
    November 3rd, 2004 at 08:44 | #1

    Hi

    I have version 4.0.5(A) installed on a w2k3 server – try the exe installer instead of the msi-package.

    /Morten

  2. Anonymous
    November 3rd, 2004 at 18:10 | #2

    I am trying 4.0.5(B) .. let me see if A works.

  3. Anonymous
    November 9th, 2004 at 15:41 | #3

    I have 4.0.5(C) running on my Win2k3 laptop. The only problem that I have is that if you are trying to use split-tunnel. The add route statment that the VPN client does to the OS does not work. I have not been able to get it to work. Any ideas?

  4. Anonymous
    November 10th, 2004 at 19:42 | #4

    We just discovered this issue today! If you figure anything out please post it back. Cisco’s response was they do not support the client on Windows Server versions. ???

  5. Anonymous
    November 10th, 2004 at 21:43 | #5

    Good News! We found a solution! I have access to both the 3.x and 4.x lines of VPN clients.

    The 3.6.6 version of the client seems to work OK with the split DNS setup.

    We also have the session initiating with the system startup..not with ctrl-alt-del. I found that the csgina.dll is different between versions and some work for that and some do not…but all versions seem to interoperate with the different client versions.

    Notes: We do get a gina error the first time we install a new client version…a reboot fixes that error.

    With the 3.6.6 version W2K03 reports it disabled a driver to prevent problems..the client still seems to work OK.

    Hope that helps..

  6. Anonymous
    November 22nd, 2004 at 23:26 | #6

    I have v. 3.6.3 installed on my Win 2003 server client. The VPN seems to work fine, however when I try to add a web service through my Visual Studio 2003 IDE (client), I can see the web service but cannot actually add a reference to it. I get the following error:

    “Invalid URI: The hostname could not be parsed.”

    The URL I am using is:

    http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/Common/CustomTags/1800_WS/WSUpdateCallInfo.cfc?wsdl

    Apparently the vsdatant.sys driver being disabled is creating an issue…

  7. kieran.obrien@bt.com
    March 11th, 2005 at 10:57 | #7

    how can i get 4.0.5(c) to install on Windows Server 2003 EE?

    i get the GetINFClass error :-(

    to add to the complexity, the 2003 installation is actually a virtual server, although I don’t think that makes much difference.

    i’ve tried both the .exe and the .msi, and have made sure that the server is in ‘install’ mode, not execute.

    any help / advise gratefully accepted !!

    cheers, kieran

  8. Winter
    March 29th, 2005 at 00:55 | #8

    Kieran,

    Being a Virtual Server dose make a def. you need to be on the box or using something like VNC to remote to the box. RDP is a good idea but dose not work very well as a system admin tool if you are going to be doing all you install/uninstall and services edit from it.

    Also do not use the MSI packed install use the .exe install.

  9. Anonymous
    July 31st, 2005 at 12:39 | #9

    Hi there,

    have the same problem with Cisco VPN client under Win 2k3 – client gets connected, but I dont have access/pings to remote network. I agree with above mentioned reason, that cisco client is unable to ADD ROUTE to the remote network. I have found a way how to beat it, but this is not the final solution – after cisco gets connected, add remote server IP as a default gateway. It enables your access to remote network, but you can’t use it for pre-logon connecting to domain (and that is what I need). Any ideas?

  10. Anonymous
    August 12th, 2005 at 16:53 | #10

    Jez – May I request you to please post the URL for downloading the Cisco VPN Client 4.0.5(A) NON-msi install package – Thanks for your help

  11. Anonymous
    October 25th, 2005 at 07:30 | #11

    any further on the add route problem would be appreciated fillchoo@hotmail.com

    here is my work around though… create a batch file that contains one command line stating “route add -p x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y z.z.z.z”

    x’s are the new route address,
    y’s are the subnet mask,
    z’s are the gateway address.

    This will create a persistant route.

    If anyone has a more permanent solution it would be much appreciated.

  12. Anonymous
    October 25th, 2005 at 07:31 | #12

    any further on the add route problem would be appreciated fillchoo@hotmail.com

    here is my work around though… create a batch file that contains one command line stating “route add -p x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y z.z.z.z”

    x’s are the new route address,
    y’s are the subnet mask,
    z’s are the gateway address.

    This will create a persistant route.

    If anyone has a more permanent solution it would be much appreciated.

  13. Anonymous
    December 30th, 2005 at 11:38 | #13

    let me know , how u got it. Cisco vpn client 3.6.6. on windows 2003 … U Geek…

    Srinivasa dot vissa at gmail dot com

  14. Jose
    June 24th, 2009 at 10:03 | #14

    ingresar a directorio de configuracion de network

    [root@gateway/]# cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/

    crear archivo

    [root@gateway/]# vi route-eth0

    ADDRESS0=192.168.1.10
    NETMASK0=255.255.255.255
    GATEWAY0=192.168.1.2 <======= next-hop

    :x

    subir la ruta

    ./ifup-route eth0

  1. December 15th, 2008 at 20:14 | #1